مروری بر دعا و نیایش در منظومه‌های نظامی گنجوی با تکیه بر «لیلی و مجنون»

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیأت علمی

2 دانشجوی دکتری دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شهرکرد

3 کارشناس ارشد زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه پیام نور

10.22103/jis.2018.8076.1560

چکیده

پیوند انسان با خداوند از طریق دعا و مناجات و رازگویی‌های انسان با خداوند، از مهم‌ترین و زیباترین حادثه‌های زندگانی بشر است که در دین، عرفان، ادبیات و بسیاری از دیگر شاخه‌های دانش و معرفت بشری از آن سخن رفته‌است. اهمیت دعا چندان است که لفظ «دعا» و مشتقاتش 200 بار در قرآن کریم به کاررفته‌است و خداوند، خود امر صریح فرموده که دعا کنید تا پاسختان دهم. پدیدۀ بسیار مهم و بنیادین دعا و نیایش در ادب دیرپای پارسی نیز جایگاه والا دارد. پیوند دیرین ادبیات و دین در ایران که نخستین نمونۀ درخشان این پیوند، متون اوستایی است، همواره دعا را در ردیف مهم‌ترین مضامین و نیز قالب‌های ارائه در ادبیات فارسی از دورۀ باستان تا میانه و نو قرار داده‌است. در ادب فارسی، از آثار حماسی چون شاهنامۀ حکیم فردوسی گرفته تا آثار داستانی از قبیل منظومه‌های نظامی و ادب غنایی و تغزّلی، همواره با کثرت و تنوّع به این پدیده برمی‌خوریم. در این مقاله برآنیم که با تکیه بر یکی از مهم‌ترین منظومه‌های داستانی پارسی، یعنی «لیلی و مجنون» نظامی گنجوی که بسیار مورد پیروی و تقلید شاعران قرار گرفته، جایگاه دعا و نیایش را در آثار نظامی به طور اخص و در ادب منظوم پارسی به طور عمومی بازنماییم و با روش توصیفی و تحلیلی، جایگاه این پدیدۀ بسیار مهم را در فرهنگ ایرانی ترسیم نماییم.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Review of prayer and praying in Nezami Ganjavi’s poetry accrding to Leyli & Majnoon

نویسنده [English]

  • ebrahim vasheghani farahani 1
چکیده [English]

 
1.Introduction
Leyli and Majnoon is the name of a narrative poem in the form of Masnavi by Nezami Ganjavi, an eminent poet of the Persian Empire in the 6th century A.H. This work is the third Masnavi in his collection of Masnavis, that is known as Nezami’s khamse. Ian Ripka, in the genealogy of this story, writes that most scholars believe that the scattered theme of this story is based on the poetry and folklore legends in the Arabic language, which they have gathered and Iranianized by Nezami. Although the names of individuals and places are still Arabic in Nezami's narration, but still Iranian culture and customs cast a shadow on this story. Some, also, consider the roots of the myths of Leyli and Majnoon as ancient Babylonian civilization (Ripka, 1998, p.104). Before Nezami Ganjavi, the name of Leyli and Majnoon appeared in Persian literature of the 4th century A.H. onwards. The oldest reference to Leyli and Majnoon in Persian poetry is in Rudaki's poems (Dehbashi, 2006, p.127). Leyli and Majnoon are also mentioned in Baba Taher Hamedani's couplets (Baba Taher, 2008, p.31). Leyli and Majnoon are often referred to in poems by other poets. The oldest but short story of Leyli and Majnoon has come from Sanai's Hadigh al-Haghigha, and that story is about the release of a gazalle by Majnoon (Sanai, 1981, p.457). But, it was Nezami who wrote the love story of Leyli and Majnoon in the form of a single and independent poem in Persian for the first time in 4700 couplets, upon Sharwan king's request. The metrics of this Masnavi was new for the storytelling, and after Nezami, many poets composed the love stories in this metrics. Regardless of the numerous translations of Nezami's version of Leyli and Majnoon in non-Persian languages, dozens of poets in Persian, Arabic, Turkish, Hindi, Urdu, Armenian, Kurdish, and other languages created similar poems, finding interest in Nezami’s Leyli and Majnoon.
Compared to Khosrow and Shirin, a poem of the same poet, Leyli and Majnoon helps to understand the cultural differences between Arabs and Iranians. The story characters in Nezami's narration are arbitrary and do not accept a large change in the events of the story. It is kind of possible to say that events happen in the Samiyan world, but the characters are largely Iranian in Nezami's mental world, and both of them are not very converged. The first version of Leyli and Magnoon in Arabic was very simple. Leyli and Majnoon, who were from an Arab tribe, were grazing their livestock in their childhood on deserts, where they fell deeply in love. In another narration, Majnoon sees Leyli in his adulthood, in a women's assembly, and falls in love. The basic Arabic theme of the story may reach the pre-Islamic or even the Babylonian civilization (Ripka, 1998, p.104), and symbols of Babylonian civilization, including praise of heavenly bodies appeared in this story. With his inventive genius, Nezami developed a simple love story with brilliant additions of Iranian mentality, in verses full of spiritual points, that nowadays form a significant part of world literature, especially Persian literature.
 
2. Methodology
Prayer has always been one of the most important subjects in Persian literature from the ancient to the Middle and New era. In Persian literature, we find this subject repeatedly in epic works such as  Hakim Ferdowsi's Shahnam and works of fiction such as Nezami’s poems and lyrical literature. This article has tried to analyze the position of prayer and praying in Iranian culture by using a descriptive and analytical method, based on Quran and traditions and books published on Nezami Ganjavi, especially in Leyli and Majnoon, to understand one of the most important and beautiful events of human life, i.e., prayer. It has been referred to in religion, mysticism, literature, and many other branches of human insight and knowledge.
 
3. Discussion
'Prayer' is a Persian word from the principle of the 'Naiation' with the structure of the verbal noun, in the meaning of prayer and praise (Moein, 2008,  the following 'prayers'). The Arabic equivalent of the term, 'prayer', is an infinitive that means the need to seek, plead with God, claim blessing, supplicate, ask for God's grace for  him or herself or another, and to call Him (Dehkhoda, 1998, the following 'Prayer'; Moein, 2008, the following 'prayer'). Also, 'prayer' in the term, means calling and seeking help, and in the terms of Shi'a, it means speaking with the Almighty in a way of asking Him solve the problems or mentioning His glorious attributes (Meshkini Ardebili, 1992, pp.16-17). The truth of prayer, which is the imperfect attention to the absolute for the elimination of its own imperfection and need, is a natural and inherent matter for which it is desirable to lose hope in all but God.
 
4. conclusion
Prayer and praying have an old and fundamental place in human life. Persian literature has witnessed the presence of religious themes since the earliest ages, especially prayer and praying. In addition to prayers scattered in Persian poetical works, praise writing has been a constant tradition in the prefaces to books of Masnavi poems. Nezami Ganjavi has also helped the continuation and strengthening of this tradition. In addition to the dispersed prayers in his five Masnavies, he prepared stunning imitations at the beginning of every Masnavi, which have been a model to follow for the poets after him. One of the outstanding examples of prayer in Nezami’s works is Leyli and Majnoon poem. By reviewing this versified story, we get the following results:
- Most of Nezami’s prayers are of direct prayer type, but sometimes he asks a mediator and makes indirect prayers.
- Some of Nezami’s prayers are directed toward worldly matters, but they don't come from worldly attachments, but rather, Nezami asks such things from God for the liberation from dependence on the world and the masters in the world.
- Other Nezami’s  prayers also have the place and time of their fulfillment in the world, but they have the otherworldly results.
-Nezami also offers fervent prayers of the characters language in his story, but these chants are, in fact, the words of his own heart from the language of others.
-To Nezami, sometimes, prayer has a secondary effects, for example, Majnoon’s prayer for heavenly  bodies, in fact, is to prove the existence of God and is like Prophet Ibrahim's saying that "I like not those that disappear".

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • prayer
  • praying
  • Leyli & Majnoon
  • Nizami Ganjavi
کتابنامه
-قرآن کریم.
- ابوالخیر، ابوسعید. (1376). رباعیات. چاپ اول. تهران: فرهنگ وهنر.
- اهلی شیرازی، محمد بن یوسف. (1344). کلیات دیوان. به کوشش حامد ربانی. تهران: سنایی.
- باباطاهر. (1387). دوبیتی‌های باباطاهر. چاپ سوم. تهران: شرکت تعاونی کارآفرینان فرهنگ وهنر.
- ثروتیان، بهروز. (1388). هنر و اندیشۀ نظامی گنجه‌ای. چاپ اول. تهران: همشهری.
- جوینی، عطاملک. (1387). تاریخ جهانگشا. تصحیح محمد بن عبداوهاب قزوینی. تهران: هرمس.
- حافظ، شمس‌الدین محمد. (1359). دیوان. تصحیح پرویز ناتل خانلری. چاپ اول. تهران: خوارزمی.
- دهباشی، علی. (1385). یاد یار مهربان (سیری در زندگی و سروده‌های رودکی). چاپ اول. تهران: صدای معاصر.
- دهخدا، علی‌اکبر. (1377). لغت‌نامه. تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
- ریپکا، یان. (1354). تاریخ ادبیات ایران. عیسی شهابی. تهران: بنگاه ترجمه ونشر کتاب.
- زرّین‌کوب، عبدالحسین. (1380). پیر گنجه در جست‌وجوی ناکجاآباد. تهران: سخن.
- سعدی، مصلح الدین. (1376). کلیات سعدی. تصحیح محمد علی فروغی. چاپ ششم. تهران: دیبا.
- سنایی، ابوالمجد. (1359). حدیقه‌الحقیقه. تصحیح و تحشیه مدرس رضوی. چاپ دوم. تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
- طباطبایی، محمد حسین. (1376). ترجمه تفسیر المیزان. چاپ نوزدهم. قم: دارالعلم.
- فردوسی، ابوالقاسم. (1380). شاهنامه. تصحیح مصطفی جیحونی. چاپ سوم. اصفهان: شاهنامه پژوهی.
- فیض کاشانی، محسن. (1403). المحجه البیضاء. بیروت.
- گات‌ها. (1378). گزارش از ابراهیم پورداوود. تهران: اساطیر.
- معین، محمد. (1387). فرهنگ فارسی. چاپ اول. تهران: حبیبی.
- مجلسی، محمدباقر. (1404). بحارالانوار. بیروت: موسسۀ وفا.
- محمدی ری‌شهری، محمد. (1392). میزان الحکمه. ترجمه حمیدرضا شیخی. چاپ سیزدهم. قم: دارالحدیث.
- مشکینی اردبیلی، علی. (1370). المصباح المنیر. قم: دفتر نشر الهادی.
- مولوی، جلال الدین محمد. (1385). مثنوی معنوی. تصحیح رینولد نیکلسون. چاپ سوم. تهران: هرمس.
- نظامی، الیاس بن یوسف. (1376). لیلی و مجنون. به کوشش دکتر حمید سعیدیان. چاپ اول. تهران: قطره.