بررسی تطبیقی ظهور شعر عارفانه در ایران و انگلستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشگاه دریانوردی و علوم دریایی چابهار، ایران

2 استادیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشگاه دریانوردی و علوم دریایی چابهار، ایران

10.22103/jis.2020.14776.1974

چکیده

ظهور شعر عارفانه در ایران و انگلستان در یک بازة زمانی یکسان صورت نگرفته است. در ایران شعر عرفانی از اوایل قرن ششم هجری به بعد با ظهور سنایی شکلی گسترده می‌یابد و با عطار، مولوی و حافظ تا قرن هشتم به اوج شکوفایی خود می‌رسد. در انگلستان نیز با شکل‌گیری رنسانس در قرن هفدهم میلادی شعر مذهبی و عرفانی با جان‌دان آغاز می‌شود و با شاعران متافیزیک چون بلیک، وردزورث و براونینگ در قرن هجدهم و نوزدهم به اوج می‌رسد و در اواخر قرن نوزدهم با توجه به تغییرات ساختاری در نظام کلیسا و رواج بی‌دینی، بیشتر به شعر مذهبی نزدیک می‌شود. وجوه مشترک شاعران عارف ایران و شاعران متافیزیک انگلستان در این است که هردو گروه معتقد بودند که شاعر مترجم اسرار ملکوتی است و شعر و سخنان شیوای شاعر می‌تواند این رموز الهی را به بهترین شکل ملموس و نمایشی کند. مقاله حاضر، که حاصل یک پژوهش کتابخانه‌ای-توصیفی است، به طور مشخص به معرفی شاعرانی می‌پردازد که سروده‌هایشان ریشه در عرفان و گرایش با یکی شدن با مبدأ هستی دارد. یافته‌های این پژوهش حاکی از آن است که محوری‌ترین موضوعات شعری عارفان این بخش از ادبیات فارسی و انگلیسی شامل خودشناسی برای رسیدن به کمال انسانی در پرتو فیض و رحمت الهی، عشق الهی از طریق تجربۀ بی‌واسطه و داشتن ارتباطی آگاهانه از جلوه‌های خداوند در طبیعت و تأمل در آفرینش، رسیدن به حیاتی معنوی و دیدن جمال بی‌انتهای خداوندی از این شاعران است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Comparative study of the the rise of mystical poetry in Iran and England

نویسندگان [English]

  • Esmail Zare Behtash 1
  • Fatemeh Elhami 2
1 Associate Professor of English Literature Chabahar Maritime University, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor of Persian LiteratureChabahar Maritime University.
چکیده [English]

1. Introduction
The underlying purpose of this article is to compare and contrast the rise and development of mystical poetry in England and Iran to find the common grounds by focusing briefly on the chief poets of the two cultures. Mysticism both in Persian and English literature laid stress on love for God along with piety and purity seeking to gain Oneness with Him. The Devine is the idyllic manifestation attained by direct or indirect experiences. Therefore, a mystic refers to a person who, in one way or another, establishes a heavenly relationship with the Divinity through purgation and self-consciousness to attain union with God.
A best place for the manifestation of mysticism is poetry. Although the rise of mystical poetry in Iran and England does not happen concurrently, in the present paper we have tried to explore the common grounds for the rise of mystical poetry in order to analyze and appreciate them.
 
2. Methodology
The present study attempts to explore the common grounds for the rise and development of mystical poetry in Iran and England focusing on the major poets. To achieve this, the present research employs a descriptive- library method to introduce these poets to show how their poetry rooted in mysticism, love for God, attempts to attain unity with the source of existence or the Oneness.
 
3. Discussion
Mystical poetry in Iran began gradually from the eighth century. With the rise of Sufi thoughts from the tenth century on this type of poetry with Sana’i brilliant odes mixed with wisdom and insightful lyrics paved the way for Attar of Nishapur’s didactic and simple masnavi (rhymed couplet). Sana'i Ghaznavi (1080 – 1141), had a tremendous influence upon Persian literature. He is considered to be the first poet to use the qasidah (ode), ghazal (lyric), and the masnavi to express the philosophical, mystical and ethical ideas of Sufism. Sana’i is followed by Attar of Nishapur (1145-1220) of whose greatness as a mystic, a poet, and a master of narrative, of whom Rumi has mentioned: "Attar was the spirit, Sana’i his eyes twain / And in time thereafter, came we in their train.” Rumi with his mystical discourse mixed with didactic allegories and mystified rhetoric takes the mystical poetry to its pinnacles. Jaláluddin Moláná Rumi was a Persian poet-philosopher, the greatest Persian mystical poet who was a major exponent of Sufi teachings as well as a profound philosopher. After eight hundred years, people from throughout the world still read Rumi, and the year 2007, the eight hundredth anniversary of his birthday was declared “Rumi Year” by UNESCO to signify the importance of his call to all humans for unity and ignoring the differences – speaking of himself, he states: “I am neither of the west, nor of the east; nor of the land, nor of the sea; … for I belong to the soul of the Beloved” who is eternal. The mystical poetry gets to its peak by Hafiz (1315-90) who celebrated the joys of love and wine but also targeted religious hypocrisy. He primarily wrote in the literary genre of lyrics or ghazals, the ideal style for expressing the ecstasy of divine inspiration. In his ghazals he deals with love, beloved, wine and taverns, all presenting ecstasy and freedom from restraint, speaking in the voice of the lover speaking of divine love. Hafiz’s influence on Persian speakers appears in divination by his poems acting somewhat similar to the Roman tradition of sortes vergilianae.
In England mysticism is associated with Richard Rolle (1300-1349) who has been called the father of English mysticism devoting himself to a contemplative life feeling heat in his chest and hearing heavenly music. Moving to the Renaissance, the dominant feature of metaphysical poets was intellectuality combined with passion. John Donne (1572-1631), dean of Saint Paul’s, achieved great success as a preacher of sermons, and, like Rumi’s audience, people tried not to miss his sermons. Apart from its fondness for conceits, “strong-lined” along with “concentration” and a “sinewy” style marked the main features of Donne’s poetry in which love was the major theme. This love starts from love of women leading to the love of God. Moving to the Romantic Movement, with regard to love and beauty, the three great English poets who were fundamentally mystical in thought are Blake (1757-1827), Wordsworth (1770-1850) and in the Victorian Period, Robert Browning (1812-1889). Blake lived in a world of glory, of spirit and of vision which was the only real world for him. Imagination for Blake was the one great reality with Art whose language speaks through symbols. Wordsworth gained his revelation of divinity through Nature with a single theme of the mystical interpretation of nature. It was not the beauty of Nature which brought him joy and peace but the very life in Nature. He believed that every flower enjoys the air it breathes. The sense of ‘Oneness’ was very strong with Coleridge. He was conscious of the symbolic quality of all things visibly surrounding us. For Browning, mysticism was the reconciliation of opposites, yet he took it for granted that the object of life is to know God and in knowing love we come to know God, hence love is a shelter from the world ‘where ignorant armies clash by night.’
 
4. Conclusion
Mystical poetry in Iran and England, though not coincided, share common grounds in search for truth, knowledge and closeness to God through mediation and prayer stressing on love and passion. The outcome of this comparative study showed that the knowledge of God and willing to unite with the Oneness is present in the poetry of the literature of both cultures. Self-knowledge for obtaining perfection under the favours of God’s compassion and mercy, through direct contemplation and self-surrender, along with having direct relation with God through His omnipresence and man’s contemplation over the Nature and the whole creation lead the life up to union with the One. This awareness is at the core of the themes of the poetry of these poets. Furthermore, it reveals that the Iranian mystical poetry compared with that of England enjoys genuineness and superiority. R. W. Emerson (1803-82), an American essayist and philosopher, believes that Asian spirituality and mysticism are richer than that of the west. R. A. Nicolson (1868-1945), English orientalist, scholar of both Islamic literature and Islamic mysticism, has praised Rumi as the greatest and most eminent poet and mystic of all the periods. Hegel praised him as one of the greatest poets and most important thinkers in world history. The common ground between these two cultures is that the mystic poet is the interpreter of celestial mysteries of existence and their eloquent discourse can easily shed light on these divine mysteries and mysticism is the idyllic interpretation of Existence.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mysticism
  • English literature
  • Persian mystical poetry
  • metaphysical poets
  • Sufi poets
کتابنامه
الف. منابع فارسی
- قرآن مجید.
-ابن­عربی، محی­الدین. (1396). انسان کامل. ترجمه گل­بابا سعیدی. تهران: جامی.
-پورنامداریان، تقی. (1384). گمشدة لب دریا. چ2. تهران: سخن.
-حافظ شیرازی، مولانا شمس الدین محمد.(1371). دیوان غزلیات. به­کوشش خلیل خطیب­رهبر، چ9. تهران: صفی­علیشاه.
-دهخدا، علی­اکبر. (1339). لغت­نامه. تهران: موسسة دهخدا.
-رزمجو، حسین. (1370). انواع ادبی و آثار آن در زبان فارسی . مشهد: آستان قدس رضوی.
-زرین­کوب، عبدالحسین. (1373). ارزش میراث صوفیه. چ7. تهران: امیرکبیر.
- زرین­کوب، عبدالحسین . (1386). با کاروان حله. چ11. تهران: علمی.
-ژورف، ادوارد .(1371). هفت بند نای. تهران: انتشارات گلشن.
-سجادی، سیدجعفر.(1373). فرهنگ اصطلاحات و تعبیرات عرفانی. چ2. تهران: طهوری.
-سجادی، سیدضیاالدین.(1380). مقدمه­ای بر مبانی عرفان و تصوّف. چاپ نهم. تهران: سمت.
-سنایی، مجدودبن آدم. (1390). دیوان سنایی غزنوی. چ4. تهران: نگاه.
- شریفیان، مهدی. (1386). جامعه­شناسی ادبیات صوفیه. همدان: دانشگاه بوعلی سینا.
-شفیعی­کدکنی، محمدرضا. (1390). «مثلث شعر عرفانی: سنایی، عطار و مولانا»، نشریه حافظ، شماره 80، صص8-37.
-عطار، محمدبن ابراهیم. (1371). منطق الطیر. چاپ هشتم. تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
- عطار، محمدبن ابراهیم. (1345) دیوان عطار. تصحیح تقی تفضلی. چاپ دوم. تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
-الهی قمشه ای، حسین. بهشتی شیرازی، سید احمد. (1381). کیمیا: دفتری در ادبیات و هنر و عرفان. تهران: انتشارات روزنه.
-مولوی، جلال­الدین محمدبلخی (1372) مثنوی. به­کوشش محمد استعلامی. جلد1. چ 4، تهران: زوار.
- مولوی، جلال­الدین محمدبلخی. (1384). کلیات شمس تبریزی( 2جلد). چ5. تهران: پیمان.
-میرصادقی، میمنت. (1373). واژه­نامه هنر شاعری. تهران: کتاب مهناز.
-یوسفی، غلامحسین. (1371). چشمة روشن. چ4. تهران: انتشارات علمی.
ب. منابع لاتین
-Abjadian, Amrollah. (1978). A Literary History of England: Middle English Literature. vol. 2. Shiraz: Shiraz University Press, 1987.
-Abrams, M.H. (1993).A Glossary literary terms. International Edition. New York: HBJ.
-Armstrong, Isobel.(­1996). Victorian Poetry: Poetry, Poetics and Politics. London: Routledge.
-Brookes, Ian. Editor-in-chief. The Chambers Dictionary, New Ninth Edition. (2005). Edinburgh: Chambers Harrap Publishers Ltd., 2005.
Burrow, Colin.(2013). Metaphysical Poetry. London: Penguin Classics, Davidson, G. “S. T.(2009) Coleridge”. Blackwell companion to the Bible in English Literature. London, Wiley-Blackwell. 2009, 413-424.
-Drabble, Margaret.(1983). Oxford companion to English Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-Elahi Ghomshe, Hossein.(2002). Kemeya [= Alchemy]: Essays on literature, art and mysticism. Tehran: Rozaneh Publications.
-Galens, David.(2002). Literary movements for students. New York: Thomson Gale.
-Gellman, J. “Mysticism”.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mysticism/. 2004.
-Greenblatt, Stephen. General Editor.(2006). The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 2 vols. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
-Mills, K. The Brownings.(2009). The Blackwell Companion to the Bible in English Literature. London, Wiley-Blackwell. 2009, 282-495.
Roberts, J. & C. Rowland. (2009). “William Blake”. The Blackwell Companion to the Bible in English Literature. London, Wiley-Blackwell. 273-282.
-Sooratgar, L.(1969). Literary History of England: from the Fourth to the Eighteenth Century. Tehran: Tehran University Press.
-Spurgeon, F. E Caroline. .(1903). Mysticism in English Literature. Tennessee: General-Books Net, 1903, rept. 2010.
-Thomson, N.S. Elbert.(1921). “Mysticism in Seventeenth-Century English Literature”. Studies in Philology. University of North Carolina Press. vol. 18, No. 2.Apr. 1921, 170-231. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4171790. Accessed: 14-03-2019 18:58 UTC.
-Zare-Behtash, Esmail.(2008). “Faith and Doubt in Victorian Poetry”. Journal of Human Sciences. No. 58/Summer, 91-116.
-Zare-Behtash.(2013). "English Metaphysical Poetry in Context". Journal of Lyrical Literature Researches, 10 (19, 77-102